000			03557cam a2200541Ki 4500
001			9780429424601
003			FlBoTFG
005			20220531132613.0
006			m o d
007			cr cnu|||unuuu
008			210108s2020 xx o 000 0 eng d
040			_aOCoLC-P _beng _erda _epn _cOCoLC-P
020			_a9780429424601 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a0429424604 _q(electronic bk.)
020			_a9780429755484 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020			_a0429755481 _q(electronic bk. : Mobipocket)
020			_a9780429755491 _q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020			_a042975549X _q(electronic bk. : EPUB)
020			_z9781138354715
020			_z9780367694920
020			_a9780429755507 _q(electronic bk. : PDF)
020			_a0429755503 _q(electronic bk. : PDF)
024	7		_a10.4324/9780429424601 _2doi
035			_a(OCoLC)1229166348 _z(OCoLC)1225548132
035			_a(OCoLC-P)1229166348
050		4	_aDS518.4 _b.S89 2020
072		7	_aSOC _x008000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aSOC _x053000 _2bisacsh
072		7	_aHBJF _2bicssc
082	0	4	_a327.4105 _223
100	1		_aSuzuki, Yu.
245	1	0	_aBritain, Japan and China, 1876-1895 : _bEast Asian International Relations before the First Sino-Japanese War.
250			_aFirst edition.
264		1	_a[Place of publication not identified] : _bRoutledge, _c2020.
300			_a1 online resource (xii, 222 pages).
336			_atext _btxt _2rdacontent
337			_acomputer _bc _2rdamedia
338			_aonline resource _bcr _2rdacarrier
490	1		_aRoutledge Studies in the Modern History of Asia Series
505	0		_aIntroduction 1. Anglo-Japanese Relationship and Korea before the Imo Mutiny 2. The Imo Crisis and Its Aftermath, July 1882-April 1884 3. East Asian Crises, Phase One: May 1884-October 1885 4. East Asian Crises, Phase Two: November 1885-February 1887 5. The Post-Crises Order in East Asia, March 1887-July 1892 6. The Road to the First Sino-Japanese War, August 1892-July 1894 7. The First Sino-Japanese War and Anglo-Japanese Relations Conclusion
520			_aThis book revises the conventional wisdom about the Anglo-Japanese relationship in the late nineteenth century that these two countries were bound by mutual sympathy and common interests, and therefore the common ground which led to the signing of the Anglo-Japanese Alliance in 1902, had already existed in the 1880s. Such understandings fail to take account of the fact that the Qing dynasty of China had emerged as the strongest regional power in East Asia by reasserting its influence as the traditional suzerain of the region in the years prior to the First Sino-Japanese War. The British and the Japanese governments clearly recognised that it would become difficult to maintain their interests in East Asia if they antagonised the Qing by challenging its claim of suzerainty over Korea. It was difficult for them to come to closer terms when their priority before 1894-5 was to maintain good relations with China, and when they were also experiencing numerous diplomatic difficulties with each other.
588			_aOCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.
650		7	_aSOCIAL SCIENCE / Ethnic Studies / General _2bisacsh
651		0	_aEast Asia _xForeign relations _zGreat Britain _xHistory _y19th century.
651		0	_aGreat Britain _xForeign relations _zEast Asia _xHistory _y19th century.
856	4	0	_3Taylor & Francis _uhttps://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/9780429424601
856	4	2	_3OCLC metadata license agreement _uhttp://www.oclc.org/content/dam/oclc/forms/terms/vbrl-201703.pdf
999			_c74630 _d74630