Redesigning petroleum taxation : aligning government and investors in the UK / Emre Üsenmez.

By: Üşenmez, Emre [author.]Material type: TextTextSeries: Publisher: Abingdon, Oxon ; New York, NY : Routledge, 2019Copyright date: ©2019Description: 1 online resource (xviii, 178 pages)Content type: text Media type: computer Carrier type: online resourceISBN: 9781315414072; 1315414074; 9781315414096; 1315414090; 9781315414065; 1315414066; 9781315414089; 1315414082Subject(s): Petroleum -- Taxation -- Great Britain | BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / Public Finance | BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / General | BUSINESS & ECONOMICS / International / AccountingDDC classification: 336.2/7866550941 LOC classification: HD9560.8.G72 | U84 2019ebOnline resources: Taylor & Francis | OCLC metadata license agreement
Contents:
Introduction -- Government's rationale for fiscal reform -- The UKCS fiscal regime prior to the fiscal review and the case for its reform -- The post-fiscal review reforms -- The new UKCS fiscal regime : a proposal for reform -- Conclusion -- Appendix I: Historical brent spot fob prices -- Bibliography -- Index.
Summary: Since its inception some 40 years ago, petroleum-specific taxation in the UK has been subject to numerous modifications. Often these modifications were brought into place not only to sufficiently incentivise the investors but also to capture a fair share for the government. However, it is evident from the frequency of changes that finding the right balance between these two aims is no easy matter. Such a balance, and the consequent fiscal stability, is necessary for the long-term relationship between the parties to endure to their mutual benefit. Still, it does not take much for one or other party to feel that they are out of balance. As a consequence, one party feels that the other party is taking an undue proportion of the value generated and that they are losing out. Yet achieving that balance and fiscal stability is possible. To understand this possibility, this book first clarifies what is meant by sufficient incentivisation and fair share before developing a new fiscal system that manages this balance and stability. Such clarification yields objective criteria against which to assess not only the existing regime, but also the newly proposed regime. This approach is further complemented by the critical analysis of the fiscal legislative framework and the evaluation of the legal positions of specific contractual elements and mechanisms found within that framework. This latter analysis is important in order to reduce the legal uncertainty such elements may create, which can otherwise lead to further reactive amendments and revisions to the fiscal regime in the future.
Tags from this library: No tags from this library for this title. Log in to add tags.
    Average rating: 0.0 (0 votes)
No physical items for this record

Introduction -- Government's rationale for fiscal reform -- The UKCS fiscal regime prior to the fiscal review and the case for its reform -- The post-fiscal review reforms -- The new UKCS fiscal regime : a proposal for reform -- Conclusion -- Appendix I: Historical brent spot fob prices -- Bibliography -- Index.

Since its inception some 40 years ago, petroleum-specific taxation in the UK has been subject to numerous modifications. Often these modifications were brought into place not only to sufficiently incentivise the investors but also to capture a fair share for the government. However, it is evident from the frequency of changes that finding the right balance between these two aims is no easy matter. Such a balance, and the consequent fiscal stability, is necessary for the long-term relationship between the parties to endure to their mutual benefit. Still, it does not take much for one or other party to feel that they are out of balance. As a consequence, one party feels that the other party is taking an undue proportion of the value generated and that they are losing out. Yet achieving that balance and fiscal stability is possible. To understand this possibility, this book first clarifies what is meant by sufficient incentivisation and fair share before developing a new fiscal system that manages this balance and stability. Such clarification yields objective criteria against which to assess not only the existing regime, but also the newly proposed regime. This approach is further complemented by the critical analysis of the fiscal legislative framework and the evaluation of the legal positions of specific contractual elements and mechanisms found within that framework. This latter analysis is important in order to reduce the legal uncertainty such elements may create, which can otherwise lead to further reactive amendments and revisions to the fiscal regime in the future.

OCLC-licensed vendor bibliographic record.

Technical University of Mombasa
Tom Mboya Street, Tudor 90420-80100 , Mombasa Kenya
Tel: (254)41-2492222/3 Fax: 2490571